The ClinGen Evidence Repository is an FDA-recognized human genetic variant database containing expert-curated assertions regarding variants' pathogenicity and supporting evidence summaries. [Disclaimer]


Variant: NM_004360.5(CDH1):c.120G>A (p.Thr40=)

CA188783

184377 (ClinVar)

Gene: CDH1
Condition: CDH1-related diffuse gastric and lobular breast cancer
Inheritance Mode: Autosomal dominant inheritance
UUID: 5ff7f54c-35a4-4b6b-a1d0-1a7350acb673
Approved on: 2023-08-18
Published on: 2023-08-18

HGVS expressions

NM_004360.5:c.120G>A
NM_004360.5(CDH1):c.120G>A (p.Thr40=)
NC_000016.10:g.68738368G>A
CM000678.2:g.68738368G>A
NC_000016.9:g.68772271G>A
CM000678.1:g.68772271G>A
NC_000016.8:g.67329772G>A
NG_008021.1:g.6077G>A
ENST00000261769.10:c.120G>A
ENST00000261769.9:c.120G>A
ENST00000422392.6:c.120G>A
ENST00000566510.5:c.120G>A
ENST00000566612.5:c.120G>A
ENST00000611625.4:c.120G>A
ENST00000612417.4:c.120G>A
ENST00000621016.4:c.120G>A
NM_004360.3:c.120G>A
NM_001317184.1:c.120G>A
NM_001317185.1:c.-1496G>A
NM_001317186.1:c.-1700G>A
NM_004360.4:c.120G>A
NM_001317184.2:c.120G>A
NM_001317185.2:c.-1496G>A
NM_001317186.2:c.-1700G>A

Likely Benign

Met criteria codes 4
PM2_Supporting BP7 BP4 BS2_Supporting
Not Met criteria codes 22
BS3 BS4 BS1 BP5 BP3 BP2 BP1 PVS1 PM6 PS3 PS1 PS2 PS4 BA1 PM5 PM4 PM3 PM1 PP4 PP1 PP3 PP2

Evidence Links 0

Expert Panel

Criteria Specification Information

Criteria Specification: ClinGen CDH1 Expert Panel Specifications to the ACMG/AMP Variant Interpretation Guidelines Version 3.1

Criteria Specification Approval History
Criteria Specifications for this VCEP
Evidence submitted by expert panel
CDH1 VCEP
The c.120G>A (p.Thr40=) variant results in a synonymous amino acid change in exon 2. Although this variant is absent from gnomAD (PM2_Supporting), it has been observed internally in at least three individuals without DGC, SRC tumours or LBC and whose families do not suggest HDGC (BS2_Supporting, SCV000214188.4, SCV001041247.2). In addition, this variant is not predicted to result in aberrant splicing and is not highly conserved (BP4, BP7). In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as likely benign based on the ACMG/AMP criteria applied as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel (Variant Interpretation Guidelines Version 3.1): BS2_supporting, BP4, BP7, PM2_Supporting.
Met criteria codes
PM2_Supporting
This variant is absent from gnomAD.
BP7
This nucleotide is not highly conserved, with negative scores by PhyloP and GERP.
BP4
Aberrant splicing is not supported by multiple computational tools. HSF predicts activation of an exonic cryptic acceptor site, but this has not been validated to our knowledge.
BS2_Supporting
This variant has been observed in 6 individuals without DGC, SRC tumours or LBC and whose families do not suggest HDGC (SCV000214188.4, SCV001041247.2).
Not Met criteria codes
BS3
To our knowledge, the function of this variant has not been assessed in vitro or in vivo.
BS4
To our knowledge, segregation of this variant has not been reported in families with HDGC.
BS1
This variant is absent from gnomAD.
BP5
To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in a case with an alternate molecular basis for disease.
BP3
BP3 does not apply to CDH1.
BP2
To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in cis or trans with a pathogenic variant.
BP1
BP1 does not apply to CDH1.
PVS1
PVS1 does not apply to this variant.
PM6
To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported as de novo.
PS3
To our knowledge, the function of this variant has not been assessed in vitro or in vivo.
PS1
No code specific comments provided, please refer to the summary above or general recommendations provided in the guideline
PS2
To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported as de novo.
PS4
This variant has been observed in 6 individuals without DGC, SRC tumours or LBC and whose families do not suggest HDGC.
BA1
This variant is absent from gnomAD.
PM5
PM5 does not apply to CDH1.
PM4
PM4 does not apply to this variant.
PM3
PM3 does not apply to CDH1.
PM1
PM1 does not apply to CDH1.
PP4
PP4 does not apply to CDH1.
PP1
To our knowledge, segregation of this variant has not been reported in families with HDGC.
PP3
Aberrant splicing is not supported by multiple computational tools. HSF predicts activation of an exonic cryptic acceptor site, but this has not been validated to our knowledge.
PP2
PP2 does not apply to CDH1.
The information on this website is not intended for direct diagnostic use or medical decision-making without review by a genetics professional. Individuals should not change their health behavior solely on the basis of information contained on this website. If you have questions about the information contained on this website, please see a health care professional.
¤ Powered by BCM's Genboree.