The ClinGen Evidence Repository is an FDA-recognized human genetic variant database containing expert-curated assertions regarding variants' pathogenicity and supporting evidence summaries. [Disclaimer]
  • No CSPEC related information was provided by the message!

  • See Evidence submitted by expert panel for details.

Variant: NM_004004.6(GJB2):c.-22-2A>C

CA6904346

375406 (ClinVar)

Gene: GJB2
Condition: nonsyndromic genetic deafness
Inheritance Mode: Autosomal recessive inheritance
UUID: 09ec9aab-7e7a-4db9-b694-2ff027effd00

HGVS expressions

NM_004004.6:c.-22-2A>C
NM_004004.6(GJB2):c.-22-2A>C
NC_000013.11:g.20189605T>G
CM000675.2:g.20189605T>G
NC_000013.10:g.20763744T>G
CM000675.1:g.20763744T>G
NC_000013.9:g.19661744T>G
NG_008358.1:g.8371A>C
ENST00000382844.2:c.-24A>C
ENST00000382848.5:c.-22-2A>C
ENST00000382844.1:c.-24A>C
ENST00000382848.4:c.-22-2A>C
NM_004004.5:c.-22-2A>C

Likely Pathogenic

Met criteria codes 4
PS3_Supporting BS1 PM3_Very Strong PP1
Not Met criteria codes 22
PM5 PM1 PM4 PM6 PM2 PVS1 BS2 BS4 BS3 BP3 BP2 BP1 BP4 BP5 BP7 BA1 PS1 PS2 PS4 PP4 PP2 PP3

Evidence Links 0

Expert Panel

Criteria Specification Information

Criteria Specifications for this VCEP
Evidence submitted by expert panel
Hearing Loss VCEP
The filtering allele frequency of the c.-22-2A>C variant in the GJB2 gene is 0.35% for Ashkenazi Jewish chromosomes in gnomAD v2.1.1 (95% CI of 47/10344), which meets the allele frequency threshold defined by the ClinGen Hearing Loss Expert Panel for considering strong evidence against pathogenicity for autosomal recessive hearing loss variants (BS1). However, based on the evidence outlined below, the ClinGen Hearing Loss Expert Panel believes that the evidence for the pathogenicity of this variant for nonsyndromic hearing loss outweighs its high allele frequency in population databases. Therefore, the BS1 code will not contribute to the overall classification. The c.-22-2A>C variant in the GJB2 gene has been detected in at least 9 patients with hearing loss in trans with the pathogenic c.35delG variant (PM3_Very Strong; PMID: 25401782, 24039984, 33096615; Invitae internal data, SCV000935680.2; Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia internal data, Molecular Otolaryngology and Renal Research Laboratories internal data) and one individual with the the p.Leu90Pro variant suspected in trans (PMID: 19814620). Phase was confirmed in at least 6 of these 10 observations.This variant has been reported to segregate with hearing loss in at least 2 family members (PP1; PMID: 24039984). It was also identified in the heterozygous state without a second variant in 8 individuals with hearing loss, and in the biallelic state (with c.35delG) in one individual with reportedly normal hearing (GeneDx, ARUP internal data, SCV000680741.2, SCV000603828.1). Of note, the severity of hearing loss is reported to be mild-moderate in affected probands, some with onset in the third to fourth decade, suggesting that this variant may be a hypomorphic allele. RNA analysis using patient cells demonstrated that the c.-22-2A>C variant leads to expression of a novel GJB2 transcript with a slightly longer 5' UTR but otherwise normal coding region. The alternate transcript was shown to have reduced expression, but it is not clear if the lower expression is sufficient to lead to a phenotype (PS3_Supporting; PMID: 24039984). In summary, the VCEP has used expert judgement to classify this variant as likely pathogenic for autosomal recessive hearing loss based on the ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the Hearing Loss Expert Panel: PM3_Very Strong, PP1, PS3_Supporting, BS1.
Met criteria codes
PS3_Supporting
Gandia 2013 performed RT-PCR on patient cells with the c.-22-2A>C/c.35delG genotype. They showed that the wild-type splice acceptor site is completely abolished by the -22-2A>C variant, and two alternative splice sites are used that are 34 and 38 nucleotides upstream of the known splice site. No normal transcript was detected in patient cells.
BS1
In gnomAD v2, present in 0.4544% (47/10344) of Ashkenazi Jewish chromosomes (lower bound of the 95% CI is 0.35%) and 0.07895% (100/126668) of non-Finnish European chromosomes. In v3, present in 0.49813% (16/3324) of Ashkenazi Jewish chromosomes; next highest frequency is 0.1025% (14/13662) of Latino chromosomes.
PM3_Very Strong
The c.-22-2A>C variant has been observed in trans with c.35delG in 9 individuals (Gandia et al PMID: 24039984, Stanghellini et al PMID: 25401782, Buonfiglio et al PMID: 33096615, MORL internal data, Invitae SCV000935680.2, CHOP internal data). Most individuals had mild-moderate hearing loss. It has also been observed in trans with the p.Leu90Pro variant (Sansovic et al PMID: 25401782). Total: 10 cases, 6 were confirmed in trans, 4 were suspected in trans. Total PM3 points count is 8 points, which corresponds to PM3_Very Strong
PP1
The c.-22-2A>C variant was identified in three family members in compound heterozygosity with c.35delG. Two affected segregations are counted here.
Not Met criteria codes
PM5
No code specific comments provided, please refer to the summary above or general recommendations provided in the guideline
PM1
No code specific comments provided, please refer to the summary above or general recommendations provided in the guideline
PM4
No code specific comments provided, please refer to the summary above or general recommendations provided in the guideline
PM6
No code specific comments provided, please refer to the summary above or general recommendations provided in the guideline
PM2
No code specific comments provided, please refer to the summary above or general recommendations provided in the guideline
PVS1
No code specific comments provided, please refer to the summary above or general recommendations provided in the guideline
BS2
No code specific comments provided, please refer to the summary above or general recommendations provided in the guideline
BS4
No code specific comments provided, please refer to the summary above or general recommendations provided in the guideline
BS3
Gandia 2013 performed RT-PCR on patient cells with the c.-22-2A>C/c.35delG genotype. They showed that the wild-type splice acceptor site is completely abolished by the -22-2A>C variant, and two alternative splice sites are used that are 34 and 38 nucleotides upstream of the known splice site. No normal transcript was detected in patient cells.
BP3
No code specific comments provided, please refer to the summary above or general recommendations provided in the guideline
BP2
No code specific comments provided, please refer to the summary above or general recommendations provided in the guideline
BP1
No code specific comments provided, please refer to the summary above or general recommendations provided in the guideline
BP4
No code specific comments provided, please refer to the summary above or general recommendations provided in the guideline
BP5
No code specific comments provided, please refer to the summary above or general recommendations provided in the guideline
BP7
No code specific comments provided, please refer to the summary above or general recommendations provided in the guideline
BA1
No code specific comments provided, please refer to the summary above or general recommendations provided in the guideline
PS1
No code specific comments provided, please refer to the summary above or general recommendations provided in the guideline
PS2
No code specific comments provided, please refer to the summary above or general recommendations provided in the guideline
PS4
No code specific comments provided, please refer to the summary above or general recommendations provided in the guideline
PP4
No code specific comments provided, please refer to the summary above or general recommendations provided in the guideline
PP2
No code specific comments provided, please refer to the summary above or general recommendations provided in the guideline
PP3
Splice predictor tools all predict wt 3' splice acceptor is abolished by this variant. Some (GeneSplicer and Human Splicing Finder) predict that a novel splice acceptor site is formed 2 bases downstream. However, to avoid double-counting splice effect accounted for by experimental evidence, PP3 was not applied. PS2_Supporting was applied instead.
Approved on: 2021-04-12
Published on: 2024-01-11
The information on this website is not intended for direct diagnostic use or medical decision-making without review by a genetics professional. Individuals should not change their health behavior solely on the basis of information contained on this website. If you have questions about the information contained on this website, please see a health care professional.
¤ Powered by BCM's Genboree.