The ClinGen Evidence Repository is an FDA-recognized human genetic variant database containing expert-curated assertions regarding variants' pathogenicity and supporting evidence summaries. [Disclaimer]

  • See Evidence submitted by expert panel for details.

Variant: NM_004360.4(CDH1):c.88C>A (p.Pro30Thr)

CA151524

127933 (ClinVar)

Gene: CDH1
Condition: hereditary diffuse gastric cancer
Inheritance Mode: Autosomal dominant inheritance
UUID: d1e6757d-87b2-428c-a699-e2ac2893485c
Approved on: 2018-11-21
Published on: 2020-06-03

HGVS expressions

NM_004360.4:c.88C>A
NM_004360.4(CDH1):c.88C>A (p.Pro30Thr)
NC_000016.10:g.68738336C>A
CM000678.2:g.68738336C>A
NC_000016.9:g.68772239C>A
CM000678.1:g.68772239C>A
NC_000016.8:g.67329740C>A
NG_008021.1:g.6045C>A
ENST00000261769.10:c.88C>A
ENST00000261769.9:c.88C>A
ENST00000422392.6:c.88C>A
ENST00000566510.5:c.88C>A
ENST00000566612.5:c.88C>A
ENST00000611625.4:c.88C>A
ENST00000612417.4:c.88C>A
ENST00000621016.4:c.88C>A
NM_004360.3:c.88C>A
NM_001317184.1:c.88C>A
NM_001317185.1:c.-1528C>A
NM_001317186.1:c.-1732C>A
NM_004360.5:c.88C>A
NM_001317184.2:c.88C>A
NM_001317185.2:c.-1528C>A
NM_001317186.2:c.-1732C>A
More

Benign

Met criteria codes 2
BA1 BS2
Not Met criteria codes 24
PP1 PP2 PP3 PP4 PM1 PM3 PM5 PM4 PM6 PM2 PVS1 BS1 BS4 BS3 BP5 BP7 BP4 BP3 BP1 BP2 PS1 PS2 PS3 PS4

Evidence Links 0

Expert Panel

Criteria Specification Information

Criteria Specifications for this VCEP
Evidence submitted by expert panel
CDH1 VCEP
The c.88C>A (p.Pro30Thr) variant has an allele frequency of 0.00249 (0.25%, 178/71372 alleles) in the European (non-Finnish) subpopulation of the gnomAD cohort (BA1). In addition to meeting stand along criteria for a benign classification, this variant has also been seen in >900 individuals without a diagnosis of diffuse gastric cancer, signet ring tumor or lobular breast cancer and whose family histories do not suggest HDGC (BS2; internal laboratory contributors). In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as benign. ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel: BA1, BS2.
Met criteria codes
BA1
0.25% frequency with 178 alleles in European subpopulation meets stand alone criteria for CDH1.
BS2
Vast majority of patients with this variant had neither lobular breast cancer nor gastric cancer. 929 non-HDGC individuals with allele number of 178,576.
Not Met criteria codes
PP1
No code specific comments provided, please refer to the summary above or general recommendations provided in the guideline
PP2
No code specific comments provided, please refer to the summary above or general recommendations provided in the guideline
PP3
In silico predictors are only valid for splicing according to CDH1 criteria.
PP4
No code specific comments provided, please refer to the summary above or general recommendations provided in the guideline
PM1
No code specific comments provided, please refer to the summary above or general recommendations provided in the guideline
PM3
No code specific comments provided, please refer to the summary above or general recommendations provided in the guideline
PM5
No code specific comments provided, please refer to the summary above or general recommendations provided in the guideline
PM4
No code specific comments provided, please refer to the summary above or general recommendations provided in the guideline
PM6
No code specific comments provided, please refer to the summary above or general recommendations provided in the guideline
PM2
0.25% frequency with 178 alleles in European subpopulation meets stand alone criteria for CDH1.
PVS1
No code specific comments provided, please refer to the summary above or general recommendations provided in the guideline
BS1
0.25% frequency with 178 alleles in European subpopulation meets stand alone criteria for CDH1.
BS4
No code specific comments provided, please refer to the summary above or general recommendations provided in the guideline
BS3
Mutation resulted in abnormal localization and reduced aggregation in CHO cells. Invasion and expression not significantly different to wild type (Vogelaar et al.) Does not meet CDH1 criteria.
BP5
No code specific comments provided, please refer to the summary above or general recommendations provided in the guideline
BP7
No code specific comments provided, please refer to the summary above or general recommendations provided in the guideline
BP4
In silico predictors are only valid for splicing according to CDH1 criteria.
BP3
No code specific comments provided, please refer to the summary above or general recommendations provided in the guideline
BP1
No code specific comments provided, please refer to the summary above or general recommendations provided in the guideline
BP2
No code specific comments provided, please refer to the summary above or general recommendations provided in the guideline
PS1
No code specific comments provided, please refer to the summary above or general recommendations provided in the guideline
PS2
No code specific comments provided, please refer to the summary above or general recommendations provided in the guideline
PS3
Mutation resulted in abnormal localization and reduced aggregation in CHO cells. Invasion and expression not significantly different to wild type (Vogelaar et al.) Does not meet CDH1 criteria.
PS4
No code specific comments provided, please refer to the summary above or general recommendations provided in the guideline
Curation History
The information on this website is not intended for direct diagnostic use or medical decision-making without review by a genetics professional. Individuals should not change their health behavior solely on the basis of information contained on this website. If you have questions about the information contained on this website, please see a health care professional.
¤ Powered by BCM's Genboree.